Why Jekyll?

06 Dec 2013

In my first post, I gave a couple of vague reasons why I decided to use Jekyll to create this website, as opposed to something like Ruby on Rails. Having recently used Rails for a school project, I can understand the appeal of using such a framework. It can be used to create powerful dynamic web apps with a range of useful tools and features. But for what I wanted out of this website, Rails would be like bringing a nuclear missile to a water gun fight. It's simply offers far more features than what I need.

Rails gives me the chance to build my own blog platform, while Jekyll is a blog platform, which allows me to focus on the blog itself, rather than writing and maintaining everything. While it would give me complete control over every aspect of my website, I am simply not interested in this level of control for such a small website. I feel comparing Jekyll and Rails is not fair because they are just two different tools that both happen to be able to accomplish the same task.

Since I'm far more interested in showing what I like about Jekyll than I am in comparing and contrasting Jekyll and Rails, I will keep the comparisons to a minimum.

Jekyll is as its website describes, "a simple, blog-aware, static site generator", nothing more, nothing less. Since it's just a ruby script, issuing a simple gem install jekyll in a terminal is all it takes to have everything installed, much like Rails. Again similar to Rails, one can then generate the scaffolding for a new blog by issuing jekyll new blog.

This is where the two diverge however, with Jekyll taking a simpler path, as far as blogs are concerned. Navigating into a newly generated blog directory gives a simple directory structure.



Even at first glance this structure is fairly simple to follow. Jekyll divides sites into three main components, layouts, posts, and CSS. Since each of these parts are constructed very differently from one another, it was a very sane choice to give each their own directory.

This layout is very easy to extend as well. For example, if JavaScript is needed then all that needs to be done is adding a js/ directory to the root of the blog directory, and it will be included in the final _site/ folder after generation.

Jekyll layouts use mainly HTML/CSS, spattered with Liquid Markup that gets interpreted to HTML at build-time. Again, if this sounds somewhat similar to how Rails works, that's because it is.

A good example of how this works is the following:


<!DOCTYPE html>
    <title>{{ page.title }}</title>
    {{ content }}

Then in index.html all that is needed is:

layout: default
title: Home

<p>Look at this snazzy navbar and footer!</p>

When jekyll build is run, the content of index.html will be combined with _layouts/default.html, with the index content being placed in the content tag, and the complete page(s), along with any CSS, will be placed in the _sites/ directory. By just using the YAML front matter at the top of a page, any page on the website can how have the navbar and footer, eliminating redundancy or inconsistencies between creating multi-page websites. I found this to be a very simple method to create consistency, while still maintaining a certain level of control for each page.

Since a huge reason to use Jekyll is for the blog features, it helps that creating blog posts is simple as well. Each blog post is written in markdown and needs to be placed in the _posts/ directory, with each following a naming convention like 2013-12-6-why-jekyll.markdown. Each post needs some YAML front matter for Jekyll to construct everything properly, but the rest can be written in pure markdown.


layout: default
title: "Why Jekyll?"
date: 2013-12-6
categories: posts

I dunno, _you_ tell me!

Jekyll makes it very simple to extend layouts for specific purposes, such as dedicated pages for a post, using YAML front matter:


layout: default

<h2>{{ page.title }}</h2>
<p class="meta">{{ page.date | date_to_string }}</p>

{{ content }}

Now each dedicated post page can display the title and post date in a header just by specifying the post layout in the YAML front matter.

Of course, Jekyll has even more to offer, like built in pagination, syntax highlighting, and countless plugins, but I'm not about to go on and on about it for that long. Jekyll has so far been very pleasant to work with, and I can't imagine switching to anything else any time soon.